Category: rijprlpi

[Cuatro] Apartments / Estudio A+3

first_imgPhotographs:  Gonzalo ViramonteSave this picture!© Gonzalo ViramonteRecommended ProductsWoodBruagBalcony BalustradesWoodGustafsWood Veneered Wall & Ceiling PanelsWoodAccoyaAccoya® Cladding, Siding & FacadesKitchen Furniture / CountertopsApavisaSlabs – LinetopText description provided by the architects. The project is located in a quiet residential area which still retains and uses the space of the past. Neighbors gather on the sidewalk, get together by block, living outer space. Our goal is focused on reinterpreting and preserve these kind of use.Save this picture!Site PlanDue to the small lot (117sqm) where the project is inserted, spaces had to be in different levels. On the entrance level a multipurpose space arises (During the overnight it acts as garage and during the day as an expansion area). In levels one and two, there are the four apartments. Above all, a terrace was incorporated. An expansion with grill and beautiful views of the mountains.Save this picture!© Gonzalo ViramonteApartmens social areas where opened towards the street, through a large window expansion and manage to extend the horizon over the environment. Bedrooms where opened onto a small patio on the back of the building. With the aim of  bringing some natural light to the bath , small window where opened between bath and kitchen in shared wall.Save this picture!First and Second Floor PlanNeeds of a growing social segment were solved, in as small apartment complex. Safety and comfort where achived into the inclusion of garage and individual terraces.Save this picture!© Gonzalo ViramonteProject gallerySee allShow lesspenda to Build Modular, Customizable Housing Tower in IndiaUnbuilt ProjectJuly ABI Remains StrongArchitecture NewsProject locationAddress:San Martín, Córdoba, Córdoba, ArgentinaLocation to be used only as a reference. It could indicate city/country but not exact address. Share Projects [Cuatro] Apartments / Estudio A+3Save this projectSave[Cuatro] Apartments / Estudio A+3 Save this picture!© Gonzalo Viramonte+ 24 Share ArchDaily CopyHousing•Córdoba, Argentina Area:  234 m² Area:  234 m² Year Completion year of this architecture project “COPY” Argentina 2014 ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/771907/cuatro-apartments-estudio-a-plus-3 Clipboard Year:  ShareFacebookTwitterPinterestWhatsappMailOrhttps://www.archdaily.com/771907/cuatro-apartments-estudio-a-plus-3 Clipboard 2014 [Cuatro] Apartments / Estudio A+3 “COPY” Photographs Year:  Architects: Estudio A+3 Area Area of this architecture project Housing CopyAbout this officeEstudio A+3OfficeFollowProductsSteelConcrete#TagsProjectsBuilt ProjectsSelected ProjectsResidential ArchitectureHousingCórdobaArgentinaPublished on August 19, 2015Cite: “[Cuatro] Apartments / Estudio A+3” 19 Aug 2015. ArchDaily. Accessed 11 Jun 2021. ISSN 0719-8884Read commentsBrowse the CatalogSinkshansgroheBathroom Mixers – MetrisVinyl Walls3MVinyl Finish – DI-NOC™ Cross HairlinePartitionsSkyfoldVertically Folding Operable Walls – Mirage®SinksThe Splash LabTrough Sink – Monolith A SeriesSkylightsVELUX CommercialModular Skylights in Helmkehof Cultural CenterBathroom AccessoriesBradley Corporation USAWashroom AccessoriesConcrete FloorsSikaDecorative Floor CoatingsMetal PanelsSherwin-Williams Coil CoatingsFluropon® Coating in Thaden SchoolWood Boards / HPL PanelsInvestwoodViroc Nature for Partition WallsMineral / Organic PaintsKEIMMineral Wood Stain – Lignosil®-VeranoDoorsdormakabaEntrance Doors – MAGNEOSinksECOPIXELWashbasin – Light Basin LTBMore products »Read commentsSave世界上最受欢迎的建筑网站现已推出你的母语版本!想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?是否翻译成中文现有为你所在地区特制的网站?想浏览ArchDaily中国吗?Take me there »✖You’ve started following your first account!Did you know?You’ll now receive updates based on what you follow! Personalize your stream and start following your favorite authors, offices and users.Go to my streamlast_img read more

AOL more accessible to blind people

 11 total views,  1 views today AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis About Howard Lake Howard Lake is a digital fundraising entrepreneur. Publisher of UK Fundraising, the world’s first web resource for professional fundraisers, since 1994. Trainer and consultant in digital fundraising. Founder of Fundraising Camp and co-founder of GoodJobs.org.uk. Researching massive growth in giving. AddThis Sharing ButtonsShare to TwitterTwitterShare to FacebookFacebookShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmailShare to WhatsAppWhatsAppShare to MessengerMessengerShare to MoreAddThis AOL version 6.0, due out this Autumn, is to work with a screen reader interface which will enable easier navigation for blind people. As a result the American National Association for the Blind announced that it had withdrawn its test case against the company.Read UK Fundraising’s report. AOL more accessible to blind people Advertisement Howard Lake | 2 August 2000 | News read more

Planned Parenthood vindicated: Makers of fraudulent videos indicted

first_imgIn a dramatic turnaround, two of the right-wingers who created a fraudulent series of videos designed to discredit and ultimately destroy Planned Parenthood, the largest nonprofit health care provider for poor and working women in the U.S., were indicted on Jan. 25.The charges grew out of a two-month investigation of Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast by a Houston grand jury to determine if Planned Parenthood had engaged in the illegal sale of fetal tissue for profit. That is what the deceptively edited videos created by the so-called Center for Medical Progress attempted to show when they were released last July.Once it became obvious to the grand jury that Planned Parenthood was blameless, the evidence revealed that the right-wing group CMP had engaged in many illegal practices — including falsely presenting CMP as a biological research group, registered with the Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)3 nonprofit charity in order to receive unlimited, anonymous donations. Rather, it is a front group for an anti-abortion sting operation.Two CMP videographers, David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt, were charged with second-degree felonies, which carry a 20-year sentence in Texas, for tampering with government records — creating phony driver’s licenses in order to gain access to Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast and interview providers there. Daleiden was also charged with trying to procure human fetal tissue for pay.An article posted on Oliver Willis’ blog, “Who’s Behind the Center for Medical Progress?” reveals the nefarious web of anti-abortion, Christian zealots and domestic terrorists behind the misnamed “Center for Medical Progress.” (oliverwillis.com, July 30, 2015)David Daleiden honed his skills creating fraudulent videos as “director of research” for the virulent anti-abortion Live Action group, founded by Lily Rose in 2004. The group produced a series of anti-choice videos from 2010-13 that accused abortion clinic providers and workers of illegal and unethical practices. The videos and the organization have since been widely discredited. Willis conjectures that it’s “actually possible” that CMP is a cover for Live Action.Operation Rescue, one of the most vocal, reactionary anti-choice groups with ties to white-supremacist, racist, right-wing groups, worked “in consultation” with CMP on the videos. Troy Newman, OR president and board member of CMP — who “retired” after the indictments — defended Paul Hill, who was convicted of murder in the 2003 killing of Dr. John Britton and James Barnett outside a Pensacola, Fla., abortion clinic. OR said such murders are “justifiable” to protect the unborn. Newman advocates and practices terrorism in many forms, including stalking, harassing and intimidating clinic workers, patients and escorts.Cheryl Sullenger, OR senior policy advisor, served time for attempting to bomb a clinic in San Diego and aided Scott Roeder, who killed abortion provider Dr. George Tiller in his church in Wichita, Kan., in 2009.The most alarming aspect of the fraudulent videos is that many right-wing legislators in Congress and various states, as well as reactionary presidential candidates, lauded the videos and promoted a national campaign to defund Planned Parenthood. That would endanger basic health care delivery for millions of poor and working women, disproportionately women of color, immigrants, homeless women, young women, victims of domestic violence and terrorism, women living in rural areas, and women with disabilities.Planned Parenthood was also subjected to terrorism, including several instances of arson and three murders at a clinic in Colorado Springs, Colo.; a series of insulting Congressional hearings; and investigations in a dozen states, which produced no charges.On Jan. 15, Planned Parenthood filed a lawsuit in San Francisco federal district court against the CMP, alleging that the group, by setting up a fake tissue procurement company and using fake identities to set up private meetings, engaged in wire and mail fraud violation, unlawfully invaded Planned Parenthood’s privacy, and engaged in illegal secret recording and trespassing.While legal, safe abortion has been the law of the land for the past 43 years, all women’s right to exert control over their own bodies is far from guaranteed. This spring the Supreme Court is hearing the first case about abortion rights in 25 years. The struggle for reproductive justice continues.Kathy Durkin contributed to this article.FacebookTwitterWhatsAppEmailPrintMoreShare thisFacebookTwitterWhatsAppEmailPrintMoreShare thislast_img read more

Councillor says Justice Minister is wrong to advocate community service

first_img Councillor says Justice Minister is wrong to advocate community service Main Evening News, Sport and Obituaries Tuesday May 25th By News Highland – March 11, 2014 Previous articleJudge appointed to review OTR letters following Downey trial collapseNext articleHogan is diluting the bottom-up approach of Leader – Cope News Highland Gardai continue to investigate Kilmacrennan fire Facebook WhatsApp Google+ Twitter RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR 365 additional cases of Covid-19 in Republic Twittercenter_img Further drop in people receiving PUP in Donegal Pinterest Man arrested on suspicion of drugs and criminal property offences in Derry Pinterest Google+ Facebook News A Donegal Councillor has called on the Justice Minister to encourage increasing sentences for serious crime.Alan Shatter has criticised the judiciary for not giving enough consideration to imposing community service over a prison sentence.But Councillor Paul Canning says the minister should be encouraging more lenghty custodial sentences – he has given the example of a case in Donegal were a man involved in a garda chase, and with 36 charges, served just two days in prison before fleeing his 1,000 euro bailHe says the Minister has got it wrong:[podcast]http://www.highlandradio.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/pcannSHAT.mp3[/podcast] 75 positive cases of Covid confirmed in North WhatsApplast_img read more

RTI Application Not To Be Rejected Merely For Not Annexing Proof Of Citizenship: CIC

first_imgRTIRTI Application Not To Be Rejected Merely For Not Annexing Proof Of Citizenship: CIC LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK1 Jan 2021 5:09 AMShare This – xThe Central Information Commission has observed that an RTI application cannot be rejected merely for not annexing proof of identity of the applicant.The authority can demand such proof only in rarest of rare case in which there is doubt about the citizenship status of the applicant, the Commission observed.R K Malik, had filed an RTI application before Central Public Information…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginThe Central Information Commission has observed that an RTI application cannot be rejected merely for not annexing proof of identity of the applicant.The authority can demand such proof only in rarest of rare case in which there is doubt about the citizenship status of the applicant, the Commission observed.R K Malik, had filed an RTI application before Central Public Information Officer, Military Engineer Services. This was rejected on the ground that that the Proof of ID was not found enclosed.  While considering the appeal, Information Commissioner Vanaja N. Sarna, referred to an earlier order passed by CIC in this regard in which it was observed as follows:The Commission considers this attitude of the Respondents as against the spirit of the RTI-Act. Actually Section 3 of the Act reads, ‘Subject to the provisions of this Act, all citizens shall have the right to information’. Nowhere does it say, nor imply, that a person would be required to prove his citizenship every time that he was asking for information. Thus, there are thousands of applications which are considered without a person providing a certificate to prove that he is an Indian citizen. This means that in the rarest of rare cases where there is a doubt that the applicant is indeed an Indian citizen, the Public Authority may ask him for proof. This, however, can only be an exception rather than the rule.”The commission said that  it is not explained how the present case is a rarest of rare case in which there is doubt about the citizenship status of the applicant i.e. he is not an Indian citizen. Directing the authority to provide information as sought for, the commission further observed:A strict warning is also issued to the concerned CPIO, Engineer in Chief office, for such blatant violation of the RTI Act. He should note that such kind of act amounts to denial of information which violates the letter and spirit of the RTI Act. In case such a mistake is repeated in future by him, the Commission will be constrained to initiate penal proceedings u/s 20 of the RTI Act . Further, in future he should remain present before the Commission for hearing without fail or at least intimate the Commission if he is unable to be present on some valid grounds .Click here to Read/Download OrderRead OrderNext Storylast_img read more

Consent Of Parties Cannot Obviate Duty Of Court To Indicate Its Reasons For Granting Or Refusing Bail: Supreme Court

first_imgTop StoriesConsent Of Parties Cannot Obviate Duty Of Court To Indicate Its Reasons For Granting Or Refusing Bail: Supreme Court LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK20 April 2021 2:18 AMShare This – xConsent of parties cannot obviate the duty of the High Court to indicate its reasons why it has either granted or refuse bail, the Supreme Court observed.The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah observed that a Court granting bail cannot obviate its duty to apply a judicial mind and to record reasons, brief as they may be, for the purpose of deciding whether or not to…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginConsent of parties cannot obviate the duty of the High Court to indicate its reasons why it has either granted or refuse bail, the Supreme Court observed.The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and MR Shah observed that a Court granting bail cannot obviate its duty to apply a judicial mind and to record reasons, brief as they may be, for the purpose of deciding whether or not to grant bail.The court observed thus while setting aside the orders of the High Court of Gujarat granting bail, under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to six murder accused who were arrested for their alleged involvement in five homicidal deaths. In the order granting bail, the High Court recorded that ‘Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not press for further reasoned order’. Disapproving this approach, the bench observed: “The grant of bail is a matter which implicates the liberty of the accused, the interest of the State and the victims of crime in the proper administration of criminal justice. It is a well-settled principle that in determining as to whether bail should be granted, the High Court, or for that matter, the Sessions Court deciding an application under Section 439 of the CrPC would not launch upon a detailed evaluation of the facts on merits since a criminal trial is still to take place. These observations while adjudicating upon bail would also not be binding on the outcome of the trial. But the Court granting bail cannot obviate its duty to apply a judicial mind and to record reasons, brief as they may be, for the purpose of deciding whether or not to grant bail. The consent of parties cannot obviate the duty of the High Court to indicate its reasons why it has either granted or refused bail. This is for the reason that the outcome of the application has a significant bearing on the liberty of the accused on one hand as well as the public interest in the due enforcement of criminal justice on the other. The rights of the victims and their families are at stake as well. These are not matters involving the private rights of two individual parties, as in a civil proceeding. The proper enforcement of criminal law is a matter of public interest. We must, therefore, disapprove of the manner in which a succession of orders in the present batch of cases has recorded that counsel for the “respective parties do not press for further reasoned order”. If this is a euphemism for not recording adequate reasons, this kind of a formula cannot shield the order from judicial scrutiny.””Grant of bail under Section 439 of the CrPC is a matter involving the exercise of judicial discretion. Judicial discretion in granting or refusing bail – as in the case of any other discretion which is vested in a court as a judicial institution – is not unstructured. The duty to record reasons is a significant safeguard which ensures that the discretion which is entrusted to the court is exercised in a judicious manner. The recording of reasons in a judicial order ensures that the thought process underlying the order is subject to scrutiny and that it meets objective standards of reason and justice. This Court in Chaman Lal v. State of U.P.8 in a similar vein has held that an order of a High Court which does not contain reasons for prima facie concluding that a bail should be granted is liable to be set aside for non-application of mind.”Nature of the offence is a circumstance which has an important bearing on the grant of bailThe court also noted that the orders of the High Court does not have any discussion about the serious nature of the offence.The nature of the offence is a circumstance which has an important bearing on the grant of bail. The orders of the High Court are conspicuous in the absence of any awareness or elaboration of the serious nature of the offence. The perversity lies in the failure of the High Court to consider an important circumstance which has a bearing on whether bail should be granted. In the two-judge Bench decision of this Court in Ram Govind Upadhyay v. Sudharshan Singh the nature of the crime was recorded as “one of the basic considerations” which has a bearing on the grant or denial of bail. The considerations which govern the grant of bail were elucidated in the judgment of this Court without attaching an exhaustive nature or character to them.We are constrained to observe that the orders passed by the High Court granting bail fail to pass muster under the law. They are oblivious to, and innocent of, the nature and gravity of the alleged offences and to the severity of the punishment in the event of conviction.Whether an order granting a bail is a precedent on grounds of parity is a matter for future adjudication In this case, the High Court while granting bail, observed that the order would not be treated as precedent in any other case on grounds of parity. Disapproving this, the bench said:”We are left unimpressed with and disapprove of the above observation of the Single Judge. Whether parity can be claimed by any other accused on the basis of the order granting bail to A-13 ought not to have been pre-judged by the Single Judge who was dealing only with the application for the grant of bail to A-13. The observation that the grant of bail to A-13 shall not be considered as a precedent for any other person who is accused in the FIR on grounds of parity does not constitute judicially appropriate reasoning. Whether an order granting a bail is a precedent on grounds of parity is a matter for future adjudication if and when an application for bail is moved on the grounds of parity on behalf of another accused. In the event that parity is claimed in such a case thereafter, it is for that court before whom parity is claimed to determine whether a case for the grant of bail on reasons of parity is made out. In other words, the observations of the Single Judge which have been noticed above are inappropriate and erroneous.”Case: Ramesh Bhavan Rathod vs. Vishanbhai Hirabhai Makwana Makwana (Koli)Coram: Justices DY Chandrachud and MR ShahCounsel: Sr. Adv Vinay Navare, Adv Jaikriti S Jadeja, Adv Aniruddha P Mayee, Sr. Adv r J S Atri,  Adv Nikhil GoelCitation:  LL 2021 SC 221Click here to Read/Download JudgmentSubscribe to LiveLaw, enjoy Ad free version and other unlimited features, just INR 599 Click here to Subscribe. All payment options available.loading….Next Storylast_img read more

Attack-class subs: Australia, Naval Group sign amendments

first_imgNaval Group will continue to report the level of contract expenditure in Australia during the course of the Future Submarine Program. View post tag: Naval Group Photo: Naval Group “Beyond maximising opportunities for engagement with Australian industry, this will also ensure that the Morrison Government’s requirement for a sovereign Future Submarine capability is met,” Minister Payne said. Posted: over 2 years ago View post tag: Submarines “These include maximising Australian industry involvement in all phases of the program.” “Today’s (23 March) announcement builds on the opportunity for industry to participate in the manufacture of equipment designed by Naval Group worth hundreds of millions of dollars across the 12 boat fleet.” View post tag: Attack class As explained, the amendments ensure that the achievement of Naval Group’s commitment is now a contractual obligation, measured during the course of the program, driving Australian industry involvement as the Attack-class submarines are designed and delivered. The amendments complement existing requirements under Defence’s contractual arrangements with Naval Group to drive Australian industry capability. This includes establishing procurement organisations in Australia, and the need to approach the Australian market in the first instance for the majority of equipment. Photo: Naval Group Related Article The Acting Minister for Defence, Senator the Hon Marise Payne said the conclusion of these negotiations reflects the Morrison Government’s joint commitment with Naval Group to Australian jobs, Australian industry and Australian sovereignty. center_img View post tag: Australian Future submarine The Australian Government’s AUD 50 billion program will see 12 Attack-class submarines designed and built for the Australian Navy. Authorities Categories: This will see Naval Group’s commitment to spend at least 60 per cent of the contract value in Australia over the life of the program reflected formally in the strategic partnering agreement, supporting Australian jobs in the defence industry. Share this article Posted: over 2 years ago View post tag: Royal Australian Navy Australia’s Future Submarine Program has reached a major milestone with the conclusion of negotiations between the Defence Ministry and French Naval Group for the amendments to the strategic partnering agreement. The first unit, HMAS Attack, is scheduled to be delivered in the early 2030s. The new submarines are to replace Australia’s current six Collins-class submarines, the first of which is set to retire in 2026. “Importantly, the amendments have been incorporated to uphold the current structure of the Strategic Partnering Agreement, which the Auditor General concluded had established a fit-for-purpose strategic partnering framework that addresses this Government’s objectives for the Program. Australia, Naval Group finalize SEA 1000 negotiationslast_img read more

Former Rep. Will Hurd writing book, expected in 2022

first_imgNEW YORK (AP) — A former Republican congressman from Texas who at times criticized President Donald Trump has a book deal. Simon & Schuster announced Wednesday that Will Hurd’s book is expected to come out in 2022. It’s currently untitled. Hurd was one of the few Black Republicans in Congress in recent years. In his book he said he’ll draw on his background and political experience to provide a unifying message. Hurd announced in 2020 that he wouldn’t seek a third term in the House of Representatives. He said he wanted to work in the private sector. Hurd differed with Trump on immigration and other issues.last_img read more

Peter Shumlin named ‘Green Governor’ of the year

first_imgVermont Governor Peter Shumlin received the 2011 Green Governor of the Year Award last week at the Opportunity Green business conference at Los Angeles Center Studios. The award was founded by Beautiful Earth Group, a sustainable energy facilities and products developer, and is presented each year by its CEO, Lex Heslin. Following the award, the governor met with local clean tech business leaders and California State Governor Jerry Brown. Governor Shumlin received the award for his environmental advocacy, regulatory reforms to support the clean tech industry in Vermont and efforts to clean the state’s energy portfolio. Shumlin, a new, young governor, is seen as a rising star in the environmental movement, and a leader who clearly sees the broader linkages of policies implemented in the Green Mountain State. The Governor was joined on stage by award-winning journalist Simran Sethi for a conversation on his outlook for sustainability in America. Shumlin took on the media’s preference for “sound bites versus substance” and the need for the United States to move away from its dependence on fossil fuels – not just because it’s good for the environment, but because it’s good for business and people’s welfare. “I really do think that Vermont has lessons to be learned in both energy efficiency and building renewables, getting off our addiction to oil, and making that an economic development issue and a jobs issue,” Governor Shumlin said. “We will continue to fight to resolve these challenges.” Governor Shumlin met with California Governor Jerry Brown later in the day to discuss critical issues facing both of their states, including the advancement of renewable energy. Governor Brown has long been recognized as an environmental leader. He has recently taken action on legislation to protect California’s environment and natural resources and has signed a series of bills in support. In April 2011 Governor Brown signed Senate Bill X1-2 into law, requiring all California’s utilities to source 33% of their electricity from renewable energy sources by 2020. In July 2011, Governor Shumlin wrote to President Obama and Governor Brown to voice his support for a single, national emission standard for passenger vehicles and light trucks. California and the federal government are in negotiations to harmonize their standards into a single national standard. Vermont is one of thirteen states and the District of Columbia which have voluntarily adopted California’s vehicle emissions standards. Beautiful Earth Group, a sustainable energy company founded in 2008, develops, owns and operates utility-scale solar and wind power generating facilities. The company’s first projects are located in the southwestern United States. Beautiful Earth invests exclusively in non-carbon emitting electricity generation and seeks to promote long-term green solutions towards a goal of sustainability. www.beautifulearthgroup.com(link is external).Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/pr/495963#ixzz1e5mqJePE(link is external) November 18, 2011 /24-7PressRelease/ —last_img read more

4 tips to reviving dormant credit card accounts

first_imgWhen many people hear the term dormant they think of once active, but now quiet volcanoes. For those scientists that have the difficult job of classifying a volcano as dormant versus extinct, the process can take years. Luckily for credit unions, they don’t need to turn to volcanologists for assistance when analyzing inactive accounts. Finding a means to erupt inactive credit card accounts is a bit easier.  Who’s your cardologist? So what is the key in both scenarios – volcano classification and credit card history?Data!  Neither scientists nor credit card analysts will get very far without solid information. Credit union card teams need to analyze as much internal and external data as possible in order to properly segment dormant cardholders before executing strategies to bring them back to life.We couldn’t agree more with the following statement from CUInsight, “The key to success is identifying which of a portfolio’s dormant credit card accounts offer the greatest potential for reactivation.”  In the article “Data-driven strategies wake sleeping credit card accounts,” the analysts have found that dormant credit card account owners generally fall into one of four basic categories: continue reading » 1SHARESShareShareSharePrintMailGooglePinterestDiggRedditStumbleuponDeliciousBufferTumblrlast_img read more